What the table covers
The comparison keeps the current Zeely benchmark intact so you can compare listed monthly pricing and included output without changing the underlying math.
Zeely Pricing: What Performance Teams Should Actually Measure
Sticker price is not the same as production economics. This page compares effective cost per usable ad output.
Last updated: February 6, 2026
What deserves extra scrutiny
Zeely's optional service-fee layer is where buyers should slow down. Once ad-spend-linked fees enter the picture, sticker price stops telling the full story.
How to use this page
Read the table first, then decide whether your team needs a lighter template workflow or a broader production system built for weekly testing volume.
Effective cost-per-video benchmark
| Option | Monthly pricing | Typical output basis | Effective cost/video |
|---|---|---|---|
| EzUGC Startup | $49 | 10 videos | $4.90 |
| EzUGC Growth | $99 | 20 videos | $4.95 |
| Zeely Starter | $29.95 | 8 AI video creatives | $3.74 |
| Zeely Plus | $49.95 | 12 AI video creatives | $4.16 |
| Zeely Growth | $79.95 | 21 AI video creatives | $3.81 |
Zeely may include additional service fees on ad spend depending on plan/booster settings.
Why teams switch
Why EzUGC is stronger than Zeely for scale
Zeely can support lightweight campaign launches, but growth teams often need deeper production control, broader asset generation, and more predictable scaling economics.
Predictable Scale
No Ad-Spend Fee Dependency
Keep production planning focused on output and workflow, without optional ad-spend fee layers.
Built for direct cost-per-creative planning
Full-Stack Asset Generation
Build UGC videos, product photo shoots, static ads, and avatar assets from one integrated workflow.
Built for Weekly Ad Velocity
Move faster from script to export so your team can run more creative tests each week with less overhead.
What this changes for your team
Higher creative throughput from one production stack
More control over assets beyond video-only outputs
Cleaner weekly scaling model for paid social teams
Pricing Snapshot and Sources
Rows above keep the current published Zeely plan math intact, then use the notes below to explain the parts of the cost model that the table cannot capture by itself.
Snapshot date: February 6, 2026
- - Zeely may charge an additional service fee on ad spend (commonly up to 12%, or 6% with Booster).
Where Zeely can work well
- Smaller teams with lower weekly creative volume
- Template-driven ad production
- Early-stage experimentation
Where EzUGC wins
- Higher throughput and lower cost per usable variation
- Better weekly testing cadence for paid social teams
- More predictable production planning
Recent G2 review
Affordable Quality Ads, Easy to Use
★★★★★
5/5Matthew L.3/26/2026I find EzUGC to be affordable and appreciate the great quality of the video and image ads it helps create. I particularly enjoy the video quality because it ensures that what customers see online is good, leading to more conversions for me. I also find the setup to be very simple and straightforward, which was a big plus when transitioning from Canva to using EzUGC all the time.
Validated ReviewerSource: G2 invite
Matthew L.
Small-Business (50 or fewer emp.)
Creative Output Preview
See EzUGC asset output in real campaigns
Produce UGC videos and supporting creative assets in one place so your team can test and iterate faster.
S
solutions.studio•6h
Views
54K+41%
Revenue
$13K+88%
S
social.solutions•8h
Views
37K+29%
Revenue
$9K+64%
B
brand.creatives•10h
Views
61K+52%
Revenue
$17K+95%
U
ugc.solutions•12h
Views
44K+35%
Revenue
$12K+73%
U
untitled.creative•14h
Views
39K+31%
Revenue
$10K+69%
C
creative.feed•16h
Views
46K+38%
Revenue
$14K+81%
S
skincare.daily•2d
Views
19K+33%
Revenue
$24K+70%
L
luxe.beauty•1d
Views
42K+22%
Revenue
$10K+66%
G
glow.essentials•1d
Views
48K+60%
Revenue
$8K+130%
W
wellness.hub•3d
Views
24K+59%
Revenue
$5K+66%
F
fit.lifestyle•5h
Views
48K+76%
Revenue
$11K+140%
B
beauty.finds•7h
Views
67K+45%
Revenue
$18K+92%
S
style.inspo•9h
Views
31K+28%
Revenue
$7K+55%
S
solutions.studio•6h
Views
54K+41%
Revenue
$13K+88%
S
social.solutions•8h
Views
37K+29%
Revenue
$9K+64%
B
brand.creatives•10h
Views
61K+52%
Revenue
$17K+95%
U
ugc.solutions•12h
Views
44K+35%
Revenue
$12K+73%
U
untitled.creative•14h
Views
39K+31%
Revenue
$10K+69%
C
creative.feed•16h
Views
46K+38%
Revenue
$14K+81%
S
skincare.daily•2d
Views
19K+33%
Revenue
$24K+70%
L
luxe.beauty•1d
Views
42K+22%
Revenue
$10K+66%
G
glow.essentials•1d
Views
48K+60%
Revenue
$8K+130%
W
wellness.hub•3d
Views
24K+59%
Revenue
$5K+66%
F
fit.lifestyle•5h
Views
48K+76%
Revenue
$11K+140%
B
beauty.finds•7h
Views
67K+45%
Revenue
$18K+92%
S
style.inspo•9h
Views
31K+28%
Revenue
$7K+55%
Frequently asked questions
Effective cost per video normalizes monthly plan price against listed output allowances, which gives a clearer comparison than sticker price alone.
Depending on plan and booster setup, Zeely may include additional ad-spend related service fees. This page calls out that risk explicitly in the benchmark notes.
EzUGC combines UGC video generation with product photo shoots, static ads, and avatar assets in one workflow, which helps teams increase weekly testing throughput.
Use the pricing sources and assumptions section on this page to review the snapshot date and referenced pricing inputs.
Compare next
Use both feature and pricing context before picking a stack.