--- title: "Wan 2.5 vs LTX 2.3 for Ad Creative Testing" description: "Wan 2.5 and LTX 2.3 compared on durations, references, prompt length and credits per render for high-volume ad testing." canonical: "https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3" last-updated: "2026-10-14" --- # Wan 2.5 vs LTX 2.3 > Two lower-cost video models with native audio. They split on reference images, prompt length and available durations. - Page: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3 - Markdown: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3.md - Wan 2.5: https://www.ezugc.ai/models/wan - LTX 2.3: https://www.ezugc.ai/models/ltx-2.3 - Last updated: 2026-10-14 - Publisher: EzUGC (both models are available in EzUGC) Wan 2.5 renders 5 or 10 seconds and accepts up to 3 reference images. LTX 2.3 renders 6, 8 or 10 seconds and accepts prompts of up to 10,000 characters. At 720p, a Wan 2.5 clip costs 25 credits per second and an 8 second LTX 2.3 clip costs 200 credits. Both generate native audio, so a quoted line and a named speaker work on either. Both are inexpensive enough to run several variants of a hook in a single sitting. ## Side by side | | Wan 2.5 | LTX 2.3 | | --- | --- | --- | | Typical render | 125 credits (5 seconds, 9:16, 720p, native audio on) | 200 credits (8 seconds, 9:16, 720p, native audio on) | | Credit rate | 25 to 40 credits per second by resolution | 25 to 40 credits per second by resolution | | Clip lengths | 5 or 10 seconds | 6, 8 or 10 seconds | | Resolutions | 720p, 1080p | 720p, 1080p, 2K | | Native audio | Yes | Yes | | Text-to-video | Yes | Yes | | Image-to-video | Yes | Yes | | Reference inputs | Up to 3 reference images for character and style consistency | First-frame image for image-to-video starts | | Prompt limit | 3,000 characters | 10,000 characters | | Best fit | consistent-character and brand-style clips built from reference images at a low per-second rate | high-volume creative testing where long, detailed scene prompts and fast iteration matter | ## When to pick Wan 2.5 Pick Wan 2.5 when you need the same character or style across several clips. Up to 3 reference images fix a face, a product and a look. A 5 second clip costs 125 credits at 720p, which makes it the lowest-cost way to try an idea. ## When to pick LTX 2.3 Pick LTX 2.3 when the scene is detailed. The prompt limit allows a full shot list, and the 6, 8 and 10 second options cover a one-beat ad, a hook plus proof, and a short demo. Resolution is free to raise: the 8 second price is 200 credits at both 720p and 1080p. ## Using both Use Wan 2.5 to establish the character with references, and LTX 2.3 to run detailed scene variations at 1080p once the script works. ## Try each model - Wan 2.5: https://app.ezugc.ai/?view=sign_up&next=%2Fdashboard%2Fvideo-ads%3Fprompt%3DVertical%2Boutdoor%2Bshot%2Bon%2Ba%2Bhiking%2Btrail.%2BA%2Bwoman%2Bin%2Ba%2Brain%2Bjacket%2Bunclips%2Ba%2Bsteel%2Bwater%2Bbottle%2Bfrom%2Bher%2Bpack%252C%2Bdrinks%2Band%2Bholds%2Bit%2Btoward%2Bthe%2Bcamera.%2BShe%2Bsays%252C%2B%2522Cold%2Bat%2Bthe%2Btop%252C%2Beven%2Bafter%2Bfour%2Bhours.%2522%2BSoft%2Bovercast%2Blight%252C%2Bbirdsong%252C%2Blight%2Bwind.%26model%3Drunware%253A201%25401%26duration%3D5%26resolution%3D720x1280&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=compare&utm_campaign=wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3&utm_content=wan-2-5 - LTX 2.3: https://app.ezugc.ai/?view=sign_up&next=%2Fdashboard%2Fvideo-ads%3Fprompt%3DVertical%2Bproduct%2Bvideo%2Bin%2Ba%2Bquiet%2Bkitchen.%2BShot%2Bone%253A%2Ba%2Bclose%2Bview%2Bof%2Ba%2Bhand%2Bscooping%2Bloose%2Bgreen%2Btea%2Bfrom%2Ba%2Btin%2Binto%2Ba%2Bglass%2Bteapot.%2BShot%2Btwo%253A%2Bhot%2Bwater%2Bpours%2Bover%2Bthe%2Bleaves%2Band%2Bthey%2Bunfurl.%2BShot%2Bthree%253A%2Ba%2Bwoman%2Bin%2Ba%2Bcream%2Bsweater%2Bholds%2Ba%2Bsteaming%2Bcup%2Bto%2Bthe%2Bcamera%2Band%2Bsays%252C%2B%2522Slow%2Bmornings%2Bstart%2Bhere.%2522%2BSoft%2Bwindow%2Blight%252C%2Bkettle%2Band%2Bpour%2Bsounds%252C%2Bcalm%2Btone.%26model%3Dlightricks%253Altx%25402.3%26duration%3D8%26resolution%3D720x1280&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=compare&utm_campaign=wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3&utm_content=ltx-2-3 - Prompt guides: https://www.ezugc.ai/prompts/wan-2-5 and https://www.ezugc.ai/prompts/ltx-2-3 ## FAQ ### Which costs less for a short clip? Wan 2.5 at 5 seconds costs 125 credits at 720p. LTX 2.3 at 6 seconds costs 150 credits at 720p, so the two sit close together and the choice follows length and references. ### Which handles longer prompts? LTX 2.3, with a limit of 10,000 characters against 3,000 for Wan 2.5. Both are well above what a typical ad prompt needs. ### Which supports reference images? Wan 2.5 accepts up to 3 reference images. LTX 2.3 supports image-to-video from a first frame, which pins the opening shot but takes a single image. ### Can both render dialogue? Yes. Native audio is generated by both. Put the spoken line in quotation marks and say who speaks it.