--- title: "Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 for Ad Clips" description: "Seedance 2.0 and Google Veo 3.1 compared on durations, references, audio and credits per render, with advice on which fits your ad brief." canonical: "https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1" last-updated: "2026-10-14" --- # Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1 > Two premium options with native audio. They differ on clip length, reference inputs, resolution tiers and how renders are metered. - Page: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1 - Markdown: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1.md - Seedance 2.0: https://www.ezugc.ai/models/seedance-2-0 - Google Veo 3.1: https://www.ezugc.ai/models/veo3 - Last updated: 2026-10-14 - Publisher: EzUGC (both models are available in EzUGC) Seedance 2.0 renders 4 to 15 seconds across 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K tiers, and an 8 second vertical clip at 720p costs 320 credits. Google Veo 3.1 renders a fixed 8 seconds at 720p and 4K and costs 1000 credits at 720p. Seedance also accepts reference images, videos and up to 3 reference audio clips, while Google Veo 3.1 takes first and last frame images and image references. Seedance renders count against a separate allowance included with each paid plan, and Google Veo 3.1 draws on credits alone. ## Side by side | | Seedance 2.0 | Google Veo 3.1 | | --- | --- | --- | | Typical render | 320 credits (8 seconds, 9:16, 720p, native audio on) | 1000 credits (8 seconds, 9:16, 720p, native audio on) | | Credit rate | 25 to 250 credits per second by resolution | 125 to 175 credits per second by resolution | | Clip lengths | 4 to 15 seconds | 8 seconds | | Resolutions | 480p, 720p, 1080p, 4K | 720p, 4K | | Native audio | Yes | Yes | | Text-to-video | Yes | Yes | | Image-to-video | Yes | Yes | | Reference inputs | Reference images and videos, plus up to 3 reference audio clips alongside a reference image or video | First and last frame images and image references | | Prompt limit | 3,000 characters | 3,000 characters | | Best fit | motion-heavy ad scenes where the extra polish is worth a slot from your Seedance allowance | polished hero shots and dialogue scenes where one fixed 8 second clip is the right length | ## When to pick Seedance 2.0 Pick Seedance 2.0 when you want motion-forward scenes, flexible length and a lower credit cost at 720p. A 480p tier at 200 credits for 8 seconds makes concept checks cheap. It is the model to try when you have reference video or reference audio to guide the result, as long as you have allowance left for the cycle. ## When to pick Google Veo 3.1 Pick Google Veo 3.1 when you want a single 8 second clip with dialogue and need no allowance management. Every render draws on credits, so planning is a matter of the credit balance. It is a fit for image-led briefs: pin a first and last frame to your product images, and describe only the movement in between. ## Using both Use Seedance 2.0 for the scenes where motion carries the idea and Google Veo 3.1 for the spoken-line ads that sit on a product frame. Both appear in the generator model list, so you can run the same brief on each and compare. ## Try each model - Seedance 2.0: https://app.ezugc.ai/?view=sign_up&next=%2Fdashboard%2Fvideo-ads%3Fprompt%3DVertical%2Bshot%2Bfollowing%2Ba%2Brunner%2527s%2Bfeet%2Bon%2Ba%2Bwet%2Bcity%2Bsidewalk%2Bat%2Bdawn%252C%2Bwhite%2Bsneakers%2Bwith%2Ba%2Bthin%2Borange%2Bstripe%2Bsplashing%2Bthrough%2Ba%2Bshallow%2Bpuddle.%2BThe%2Bcamera%2Bswings%2Bup%2Bto%2Bthe%2Brunner%2527s%2Bface%2Bas%2Bshe%2Bgrins%2Band%2Bsays%252C%2B%2522They%2Bfeel%2Blight%2Beven%2Bwhen%2Bthe%2Brain%2Bstarts.%2522%2BCool%2Bblue%2Blight%252C%2Brhythmic%2Bfootsteps%252C%2Bdistant%2Btraffic.%26model%3Dseedance2%253A20%25401%26duration%3D8%26resolution%3D720x1280&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=compare&utm_campaign=seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1&utm_content=seedance-2 - Google Veo 3.1: https://app.ezugc.ai/?view=sign_up&next=%2Fdashboard%2Fvideo-ads%3Fprompt%3DVertical%2Bhandheld%2Bvideo.%2BA%2Bwoman%2Bin%2Bher%2Blate%2B20s%2Bstands%2Bat%2Ba%2Bbright%2Bbathroom%2Bmirror%2Bholding%2Ban%2Bamber%2Bdropper%2Bbottle%2Bof%2Bvitamin%2BC%2Bserum.%2BSoft%2Bmorning%2Bwindow%2Blight%252C%2Bshallow%2Bdepth%2Bof%2Bfield.%2BShe%2Bsmiles%2Bat%2Bthe%2Bcamera%2Band%2Bsays%252C%2B%2522I%2Bswapped%2Bthree%2Bproducts%2Bfor%2Bthis%2Bone.%2522%2BShe%2Bpresses%2Ba%2Bdrop%2Bonto%2Bher%2Bfingertip%2Band%2Bpats%2Bit%2Bon%2Bher%2Bcheek.%2BNatural%2Broom%2Btone%252C%2Blight%2Bwater%2Bdrip%2Bin%2Bthe%2Bbackground.%26model%3Dgoogle%253A3%25402%26duration%3D8%26resolution%3D720x1280&utm_source=marketing&utm_medium=compare&utm_campaign=seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1&utm_content=veo-3-1 - Prompt guides: https://www.ezugc.ai/prompts/seedance-2 and https://www.ezugc.ai/prompts/veo-3-1 ## FAQ ### How is Seedance 2.0 metered differently from Google Veo 3.1? Seedance 2.0 renders count against a separate Seedance allowance on your plan in addition to credits. Google Veo 3.1 renders draw on credits only. ### Which has the lower credit cost for 8 seconds at 720p? Seedance 2.0 at 320 credits, against 1000 for Google Veo 3.1. Seedance 2.0 at 480p costs 200 credits for 8 seconds. ### Which accepts reference audio? Seedance 2.0 accepts up to 3 reference audio clips when the request includes a reference image or video. Google Veo 3.1 generates its own audio from the prompt. ### Can I run one prompt on both models? Yes. Both take text prompts of up to 3,000 characters, so a single brief runs unchanged. Set the Seedance duration to 8 seconds to match the fixed Google Veo 3.1 length.