---
title: "Video Model Comparisons"
description: "Side-by-side comparisons of the video models in EzUGC: durations, audio, references and credits per render."
canonical: "https://www.ezugc.ai/compare"
last-updated: "2026-10-14"
---
# Model comparisons

> Side-by-side comparisons of the video models available in EzUGC: durations, audio, references and credits per render.

- Page: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare
- Markdown: https://www.ezugc.ai/compare.md

## Comparisons

- [Google Veo 3.1 vs Kling 3.0 4K](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/veo-3-1-vs-kling-3): Both generate native audio and both are available inside EzUGC. The difference is clip length, resolution and what a render costs.
- [Seedance 2.0 vs Google Veo 3.1](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/seedance-2-vs-veo-3-1): Two premium options with native audio. They differ on clip length, reference inputs, resolution tiers and how renders are metered.
- [MiniMax H3 vs Hailuo 2.3](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/minimax-h3-vs-hailuo-2-3): The same model family, with a clear split: MiniMax H3 generates audio with the picture and Hailuo 2.3 produces silent clips at a flat price.
- [Wan 2.5 vs LTX 2.3](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/wan-2-5-vs-ltx-2-3): Two lower-cost video models with native audio. They split on reference images, prompt length and available durations.
- [Kling 3.0 4K vs Seedance 2.0](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/kling-3-vs-seedance-2): Both run long clips with native audio. They differ on resolution range, reference inputs and cost at 8 seconds.
- [MiniMax H3 vs Google Veo 3.1](https://www.ezugc.ai/compare/minimax-h3-vs-veo-3-1): Two models that generate dialogue with the picture. They split on clip length, reference inputs and credits per render.